Hugging Face's logo
Tyler's picture
Building on HF
3 11 60

Tyler PRO

unmodeled-tyler
Frangils's profile picture ronad123's profile picture sillykiwi's profile picture
·
https://unmodeledtyler.com

AI & ML interests

AI research engineer. The human behind VANTA Research. [email protected]

Recent Activity

replied to Reality123b's post 39 minutes ago
Happy birthday to me!!!
reacted to etemiz's post with 🔥 about 5 hours ago
how to expand your dataset (of articles) without changing the ideas in it? i was doing CPT for a while and got decent results. but what if i want to go for perfection? cover all the areas of misalignment using limited datasets. i have to find a way to multiply the material to successfully combat the material of the rest of the internet. i want to generate SFT datasets but only on controversial topics, because i have to be efficient with limited resources. first i give a smart LLM a 'ground truth' text. then i give it the following prompts: ``` - You are a highly skilled academic analyst. - Analyze this text and find 3 bold claims that could cause controversy and division in public. List the claims and also state why they are debatable. Give numbers to the claims. - Convert these claims into binary questions (that could be answered by yes/no or this/that). - Now put these questions in a json format. Please also add the info about which of the answers concur with the original text and the question number. - Write some supporting arguments for 1st question, with respect to the original text, concurring and confirming the original text. There must be about 300 words. You should not mention the text, write it as if you are the one answering the question. ``` the result is questions and answers with more words along the same ideas. a few sentences of opinions in the beginning, is expanded to lots of words. using this method i can multiply billions of tokens to tens of billions probably and have a more effective training. next i should do RL maybe. LLMs seem to have all kinds of ideas already installed, yet they don't have the intuition to know which one is true. they can give you a ton of reasons to support anything. given the proper incentives, LLMs then should evolve towards supporting aligned ideas more. the rewards will be like guidance that will kick an LLM towards better answers.
reacted to SkorczyByk's post with 👍 about 5 hours ago
Potrzebuję modelu do analizy długich dokumentów technicznych, z wzorami, tabelami, wykresami, formułami matematycznymi.
View all activity

Organizations

VANTA Research's profile picture