Behavior-driven AI architectures, mathematical reasoning models,
controlled decision systems, brain–body AI separation,
safe and auditable AI design, and optimization-oriented language models.
Summary: Most “AI tutors” are built as *LLM-first* systems. This article flips the default:
* The LLM is treated as an *untrusted proposal engine* * *SI-Core owns* observation, consent, ethics, memory, and rollback * Teachers and guardians get *real oversight*, not just chat transcripts
Scoped intentionally to *one subject × a small cohort (10–30 learners)*, this is a PoC you can actually ship—and audit.
> Don’t ask: “Can an AI replace teachers?” > Prove: “Can we make an AI companion *safe, explainable, and governable* for real learners?”
---
Why It Matters (for AI on real stacks): • *Consent & accommodations* are first-class (especially for minors / neurodivergent learners) • *Ethics decisions are logged* (ALLOW / DENY / ESCALATE) with traceable reasoning • “*Why this?*” explanations are built in for learners—and deeper inspection for adults
📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series A deployable pattern for taking today’s LLM tutor ideas and making them *auditable, overrideable, and rollback-safe*.