Dataset Viewer
Unnamed: 0
int64 | seq.1.length.main.vote_2024..
int64 | main.byo_best_words
string | main.byo_worst_words
string | main.vote_2024
string | main.age_group
string | main.CountyName
string | main.be_0
string | main.be_l30
float64 | main.edu_group
string | main.buildingFloors
int64 | main.urban
string | main.homeownership_2
int64 | messages
list |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
| 1
|
It needs to have law enforcement in code.
| null |
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Miami-Dade County
|
Somewhat support
| 0.75
|
4 yr college degree
| 12
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
2
| 2
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
18 to 29
|
Norfolk County
|
Somewhat support
| 0.75
|
4 yr college degree
| 40
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
3
| 3
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Sacramento County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.5
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
4
| 4
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Cobb County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0.5
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 8
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
5
| 5
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
18 to 29
|
Rockland County
|
Somewhat support
| 1
|
Grad/Prof degree
| 8
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
6
| 6
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
18 to 29
|
King County
|
Somewhat support
| 0
|
Grad/Prof degree
| 8
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
7
| 7
|
I would oppose the development
|
I would oppose the development
|
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Davis County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0
|
Grad/Prof degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: I would oppose the development\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
8
| 8
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Fairfax County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0.25
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
9
| 9
|
I would probably advocate for affordable housing for lower income people, as that's where most people lie in terms of status.
| null |
Kamala Harris
|
18 to 29
|
Alameda County
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
4 yr college degree
| 8
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
10
| 10
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Allegheny County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0.75
|
4 yr college degree
| 8
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
11
| 11
|
Make it affordable to many people
|
Make it affordable
|
Kamala Harris
|
50+
|
Palm Beach County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0.25
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: Make it affordable\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
12
| 12
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
18 to 29
|
Bronx County
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 40
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
13
| 13
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Orange County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0.75
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
14
| 14
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
18 to 29
|
Prince George's County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0.25
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
15
| 15
| null |
Unsure
|
Donald Trump
|
50+
|
Middlesex County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0.5
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
Town
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: Unsure\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
16
| 16
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Franklin County
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
17
| 17
|
I support affordable housing
|
I do not support
|
Kamala Harris
|
50+
|
Fairfax County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0.5
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: I do not support\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
18
| 18
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
50+
|
Los Angeles County
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
19
| 19
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
18 to 29
|
King County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
20
| 20
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
30 to 49
|
Maricopa County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.5
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
21
| 21
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
50+
|
Kings County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 20
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
22
| 22
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Nassau County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 12
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
23
| 23
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
30 to 49
|
Stafford County
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
Town
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
24
| 24
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Hamilton County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.5
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
25
| 25
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Burlington County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0
|
Grad/Prof degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
26
| 26
|
Not sure
|
Idk
|
Kamala Harris
|
50+
|
Cook County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 1
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: Idk\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
27
| 27
|
I live in a very quiet very affluent neighborhood. We don’t have to worry about criminals around here and I’m sorry to say low income people no matter what color they are brings in crime. I don’t want my neighborhood to change. I love it as is.
|
Keep my neighborhood as is please.
|
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Cook County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0
|
Grad/Prof degree
| 4
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: Keep my neighborhood as is please.\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
28
| 28
|
I feel it's something I could do to help the community by showing and expressing support for a much needed affordable housing
| null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Los Angeles County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0.75
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 8
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
29
| 29
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
18 to 29
|
Mecklenburg County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
30
| 30
|
i would say even if this would benefit a few peoples houses values would drop they would be more crime and lower class people would occupy the neighborhood
| null |
Donald Trump
|
50+
|
Broward County
|
Strongly support
| 0
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 20
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
31
| 31
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
18 to 29
|
Stark County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 1
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
32
| 32
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
50+
|
Macomb County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0.5
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
33
| 33
| null | null |
Not eligible to vote
|
18 to 29
|
Riverside County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 1
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
34
| 34
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
50+
|
Snohomish County
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
35
| 35
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
50+
|
Anoka County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 8
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
36
| 36
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
New York County
|
Strongly support
| 1
|
4 yr college degree
| 40
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
37
| 37
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
18 to 29
|
Lorain County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.5
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
38
| 38
|
That we.need affordable housing
|
We.need affordable housing
|
Kamala Harris
|
50+
|
New Castle County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0.25
|
4 yr college degree
| 8
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: We.need affordable housing\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
39
| 39
|
I would say that I want something with a mix of different income levels but want something that won’t raise my taxes.
| null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Hamilton County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0.25
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
40
| 40
|
I would just be there to voice the need for affordable housing in my neighborhood. This is a college town and there aren't enough places for lower income people even though lower income people are what keeps this city alive.
| null |
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Washtenaw County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 8
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
41
| 41
|
I would like to know if they will provide any perks for the neighborhood and neighbors in the surrounding area
|
I would like to know if they will provide extra security
|
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Camden County
|
Somewhat support
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: I would like to know if they will provide extra security\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
42
| 42
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
50+
|
Cook County
|
Somewhat support
| 0.75
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
43
| 43
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Palm Beach County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
44
| 44
|
I would tell them we need low income housing in our area,
|
I would tell them we do not need high priced apts in our area
|
Kamala Harris
|
50+
|
Lake County
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 8
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: I would tell them we do not need high priced apts in our area\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
45
| 45
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Wayne County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.5
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
46
| 46
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
18 to 29
|
Los Angeles County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.5
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 8
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
47
| 47
|
modern to me
|
nice for me
|
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Cook County
|
Somewhat support
| 0.75
|
Grad/Prof degree
| 20
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: nice for me\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
48
| 48
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Tarrant County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.5
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
49
| 49
| null | null |
Other
|
18 to 29
|
Harris County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 8
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
50
| 50
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
50+
|
Allegheny County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.25
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
51
| 51
|
No parking allocation is a huge NO
|
No parking allocation is a huge no
|
Donald Trump
|
50+
|
Orange County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0.25
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: No parking allocation is a huge no\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
52
| 52
|
We do not need a large amount of low income housing. We do need more medium income housing.
|
The crime rate is already high. This building would only make things worse. This building would have a huge impact on our schools in a negative way.
|
Donald Trump
|
50+
|
Lorain County
|
Strongly support
| 0.25
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 8
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: The crime rate is already high. This building would only make things worse. This building would have a huge impact on our schools in a negative way.\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
53
| 53
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
18 to 29
|
Nassau County
|
Somewhat support
| 0.5
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
54
| 54
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
30 to 49
|
Cuyahoga County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 8
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
55
| 55
| null | null |
Donald Trump
|
50+
|
Montgomery County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.5
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
56
| 56
|
Traffic is already pretty bad in my area so I would say it would make traffic worse. More traffic will cause more car accidents.
| null |
Kamala Harris
|
50+
|
Osceola County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0.25
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
57
| 57
|
This town has been deemed low income neighborhood for 30+ years. It's a place where we all treat each other as one. There's no putting other families down because we all live here. If you start adding condo's for rich people, it's going to cause a major issue. They'll start complaining that our houses need to look like their valued at over $200,000 and up. When I first bought my house and I started renovating each room when I had money and a sheet of drywall was $2.99 a sheet on regular price. Now it's over $13 a sheet and up. Most of us can afford to get new siding on their homes. They'd create so many issues for the low income families. As a matter of fact, one individual that has a rich daddy came down to our town to see the property his dad owns down here and I hadn't been able to cut my grass yet, he put a note on my car threatening to kill my family if it wasn't cut next time he came through. Needless to say, I'm not sitting back with this threat. My point is, people with money would do the same, with less drastic threats.
|
I would tell them that we get along just well in this neighborhood and understand we're not all rich. We would pitch in to help these people in any ways that we can. We've already gotten 2 low income buildings in our area. We're down here in our own happy town. Once money starts coming into play, we'll be having to find a new place to live.
|
Donald Trump
|
50+
|
Allegheny County
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: I would tell them that we get along just well in this neighborhood and understand we're not all rich. We would pitch in to help these people in any ways that we can. We've already gotten 2 low income buildings in our area. We're down here in our own happy town. Once money starts coming into play, we'll be having to find a new place to live.\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
58
| 58
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
18 to 29
|
Nassau County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0.75
|
4 yr college degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
59
| 59
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
30 to 49
|
Bronx County
|
Somewhat support
| 0.75
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
Town
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
60
| 60
|
I think that when you lower the prices so dramatically, you tend to get people who are more likely to use drugs, break the law, and make the neighborhood unsafe. By increasing the price of some apartments, you will attract people who are more likely to be responsible.
|
I believe the argument above applies here as well.
|
Donald Trump
|
30 to 49
|
Los Angeles County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 0
|
LTHS or HS grad
| 4
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: I believe the argument above applies here as well.\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
61
| 61
|
Would prefer to still have good neigborhood and school district
|
Would like to have safe neighborhood
|
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Westchester County
|
Somewhat support
| 0.25
|
4 yr college degree
| 12
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: Would like to have safe neighborhood\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
62
| 62
| null | null |
Did not vote for President
|
18 to 29
|
Passaic County
|
Strongly oppose
| 0.75
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
63
| 63
|
This would represent & encourage people's & families of all economic backgrounds, which would reflect a desired sense of community.
|
The interests of all socio-economic backgrounds would NOT be served in this model, and would not reflect or represent the interests of the community as a whole.
|
Donald Trump
|
50+
|
Cass County
|
Somewhat oppose
| 0.75
|
Grad/Prof degree
| 4
|
Suburb
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: The interests of all socio-economic backgrounds would NOT be served in this model, and would not reflect or represent the interests of the community as a whole.\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
64
| 64
|
I would express my approval for the building and it’s low rent laws.
| null |
Kamala Harris
|
18 to 29
|
Santa Clara County
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
City
| 1
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
65
| 65
| null | null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Baltimore city
|
Strongly oppose
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 8
|
City
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
66
| 66
|
Housing should be affordable for all
| null |
Kamala Harris
|
30 to 49
|
Marion County
|
Neither support nor oppose
| 1
|
Some college or 2 year college
| 4
|
Suburb
| 0
|
[
{
"content": "/no_think",
"role": "system"
},
{
"content": "\nIn this housing survey, respondents were asked to create what their least-favorite and most-favorite new buildings\nwould look like in their neighborhoods. Respondents were then asked what they would say about each building\nat a city council meeting on housing. The column main.byo_worst_words contains what respondents would say at a meeting about their\nleast-ideal building. Classify what the main concern is for each response from each respondent. The values of these questions may be \"BLANK\" if the\nrespondent did not provide an answer. The user will provide you with the values of these two questions, and you will respond with either\n\"safety\", \"density\", \"traffic/parking\", \"home values\", \"classism\", \"affordability\", \"racial resentment\", \"not needed\" or \"unclear/other\".\n\nRespond \"affordability\" if the respondent would say that they are concerned with costs. For example,\"I would be concerned about being priced\nout of my neighborhood if expensive units like this are built\".\n\nVague statements should be coded as \"unclear/other\", such as, one value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I would oppose the development\". \nThis value does not contain any information about why the\nrespondent would opppose the development, thus you should respond with \"unclear/other\". \nAnother value states \"Keep my neighborhood as is please.\"\nAgain, this does not specify why the respondent wants to maintain the status quo and should be labeled \"unclear/other\". Excessively short responses\nsuch as simply \"yes\" should be coded as \"unclear/other\". \n\nAnother value of main.byo_worst_words is \"I am totally apposed to adding apartments to our single family area\". This sentence suggests the\nrespondent doesn't want apartments in the area and wants to maintain their area as \"single family\". You should respond with \"density\".\n\nAn example that should be responded with \"classism\" is \"Do not let low income people live in my neighborhood.\" Do not label concerns about affordability\nsuch as \"Rich people shouldn't take up apartments from people that can't afford homes\" as classism.\n\nRespond \"home values\" only if the respondent is concerned about the value of their home depreciating, not if their concern is affordability. \n\nIf the value of main.byo_worst_words is \"BLANK\" or null you should respond with \"unknown\".\n\nAnswer of the respondent:\nmain.byo_worst_words: BLANK\n",
"role": "user"
}
] |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 17